When Truman Capote went on tour with The Rolling Stones, it turned into one of the strangest and most uncomfortable episodes in rock-and-roll journalism.
It was 1972. The year of swagger and excess. Of stadium lights and packed arenas.
And into that haze… stepped Truman Capote, armed with his little notebook, and Lee Radziwill to boot.
He had signed on to chronicle the Stones’ 1972 American tour for Rolling Stone magazine. The idea was to capture the decadence and cultural power of the band at their peak. Capote, then in his late 40s, known for ‘In Cold Blood’ and high-society Manhattan circles, was dropped into the chaotic, drug-heavy, sexually charged world of early ’70s rock and roll.
So there stood Capote. Observing. Judging. Absorbing. Or at least trying to.
Yes, he was fascinated, but he was also appalled.
He found the band crude and uninteresting, later describing them in unflattering terms, mocking their intelligence and manners. Capote reportedly described them in ways that were less than charitable.
The Stones were not amused and didn’t quite know what to make of him. The precise Southern diction and arched eyebrow. The way he seemed to study them as if they were specimens under glass. Capote’s sharp tongue, formal manner, and outsider vibe clashed with the band’s loose, chaotic touring culture. These weren’t the polished socialites of his New York world. They were raw, loud and unfiltered.
And so, before the final encore had rung out across America, Capote quietly exited the tour in New Orleans, not to reappear again till the final shows at Madison Square Garden. Notebook in hand but not quite full. Story not quite written.
The grand literary chronicle? It never fully materialized, an established pattern with Capote who, by that time, would often promise literary gold and only to deliver empty promises.
Instead, sometime in 1973, Andy Warhol turned up, at the request of Rolling Stone, with his tape recorder and that pale, curious gaze of his to ask him about it all.
Did Capote enjoy traveling with the Stones?
The answer was disarmingly simple.
Yes, of course he enjoyed it.
How could one not? The tour was amusing. There were moments of pure spectacle, people behaving as though the normal rules of gravity, of consequence, of ordinary life had temporarily been suspended. But enjoyment, Capote explained, is not the same as creative necessity and that was all he had to say about that.
The episode became emblematic of Capote’s slow public unraveling in the years after the success of ‘In Cold Blood’. Instead of producing what he had imagined as a glamorous insider chronicle, the trip exposed just how alien the emerging rock-star lifestyle was—even to someone as flamboyant and socially adventurous as Capote, the self-appointed ringmaster suddenly discovering the circus no longer required him.
Which leaves us with an odd little footnote in literary and rock history: the story that might have been told but wasn’t. The chronicle everyone expected but that quietly dissolved into memory instead.
And perhaps, in its own way, that is fitting.
Not every story wants to be captured. Some pass through the world like music echoing down a hotel hallway late at night, loud, momentarily intoxicating, and then gone before anyone can quite write it down.
Comments
Post a Comment